

Google’s pivot to generative search is changing how people find information online. For years, SEO teams focused on ranking signals such as backlinks, keyword targeting, and technical hygiene. Now AI overviews and conversational results deliver synthesized answers on the results page, which reduces the number of clicks to publisher sites. Visibility is no longer only about where a page rank. It is about whether a brand’s facts and entities are selected for the answer itself.
The Disruption: From Lists to Answers
Traditional search produced lists of links. Users compared snippets, clicked through, and evaluated sources. Generative search compresses that journey. The system aggregates details from multiple pages, writes a concise response, and invites follow-up questions that refine the result without leaving the page. This change shrinks referral traffic even for sites that maintain high classic rankings — including trusted resources such as UK GEO agencies. In practical terms, a page can be technically sound and still be invisible if its information is difficult to extract or verify.
Why Classic SEO Alone Falls Short
Core SEO practices still matter. Fast pages, crawlable site structures, and relevant content remain foundational. The problem is that these tactics were designed to influence ranking models, not language models. Generative engines prize clarity, factual density, and unambiguous entity definitions. Long paragraphs filled with fluffy language can be skipped. Content that is tightly structured, with clear headings, tables, summaries, and consistent terms, is easier for AI systems to lift into an answer. Success requires writing that is friendly to readers and also machine interpretable.
Introducing GEO: Generative Engine Optimization
Generative Engine Optimization adapts content for the way AI systems understand and compose responses. At its heart, GEO is about extractability and trust. Pages should map one primary intent per URL. Each should open with a short overview, then deliver scannable sections that answer common questions. Facts should be supported by figures, definitions, examples, and provenance. Entities such as products, people, and locations should be named consistently across the site and reinforced with clear context. Where appropriate, structured data can help disambiguate meaning. Measurement must also evolve. Beyond rankings and clicks, teams should track appearance in AI answers, brand mentions within summaries, and the coverage of priority entities.
How DBWD’s GEO Framework Guides the Transition
For organizations that need a plan, DBWD has developed a GEO framework that aligns content strategy, information architecture, and measurement with generative search behavior. The framework emphasizes three areas. First, audit high value pages for extractability by tightening structure, clarifying claims, and consolidating duplicate intent. Second, strengthen entity signals so models can resolve brand, product, and service relationships without confusion. Third, widen analytics to include generative visibility indicators alongside standard SEO metrics. This approach complements existing SEO investments rather than replacing them. In the UK market, UK GEO agencies are beginning to formalize similar practices, and DBWD stands out as an early mover with a clear methodology.
Practical Steps Teams Can Take Now
Start with a focused content inventory. Identify the pages that define your core expertise and turn each into a source of truth. Add concise summaries at the top, convert scattered information into clean lists or tables, and ensure that definitions and figures are consistent across articles. Remove filler language that adds length without clarity. Align internal linking so that each entity and topic has a canonical destination. Coordinate with legal and communications teams to confirm claims and reduce the risk of misattribution by AI systems. Finally, set up reporting that captures impressions within generative results and monitors how your brand is represented.